Sunday, February 21, 2010

Homework 8, Due February 26,2010

Presidential elections are always important and are usually exciting events that draw the energy and passion of the American people into public service and discussion. The right to vote in free and fair elections is one of the greatest privileges of citizenship, and the need to vote responsibly, which means based on the issues and the character of the candidates, is our greatest civic duty. While many people love politics, for some who have grown cynical, the word itself is negative. Unfortunately the political process has weaknesses; for instance, it takes so much money to run for office today that many qualified citizens never run because they don’t have access to the necessary finances. There is a great debate today about how to fix that problem, because it seems that there is no easy solution.
Perhaps the most hotly contested election and certainly the closest was the election of 1960. The Democrats had no established candidate, and it was obvious that Senator Adlai Stevenson wouldn’t be nominated a third time in a row. The Democrats were the dominate party but had not been in the White House during the previous eight years – instead, a very non-political moderate Republican, Dwight D. Eisenhower, had served. Now that the elderly President Eisenhower was leaving office and it was likely that the Republicans would nominate his young vice-president Richard Nixon to be their candidate, even though there were rumors that he had “bent the rules” in previous elections. Nixon went on national television to deny the allegations and explained that the only bribe he’d ever taken was a puppy named “Checkers” and that he intended to keep the dog.
The Democratic nominee who would emerge is an iconic figure in American history – John F. Kennedy, a young senator from Massachusetts who had served in the Navy in World War II. The Kennedys were a unique family. John Kennedy’s dad was ambassador to Great Britain during FDR’s presidency, and John’s older brother Joe had died during the war. John’s maternal grandfather had been a famous Irish-American mayor of Boston, and both sides of the family were very wealthy. All of the Kennedys attended Harvard and went on to law school. The three young Kennedy men (John and his younger brothers Robert and Edward) all held press credentials, and John’s wife Jacqueline was a reporter who spoke three languages (she would later make speeches in Spanish and French during the Kennedys’ trips to other countries).
The election changed America in several ways. One important development was that for the first time the candidates debated on live television, which played up to Kennedy’s stylish appearance and smooth public speaking abilities. Nixon, on the other hand, was uncomfortable in front of the cameras and came across poorly. To make matters worse he had suffered a serious knee injury and was unable to get the infection properly cared for; the result was that he was in tremendous pain, looked very pale (and refused to allow stage makeup to be applied) and wiped sweat from his face throughout the entire debate. Still, when the votes were counted Kennedy won by a smaller margin than the number of people who usually attend a UK football game – a tiny fraction of one percent of the voting population! Kennedy became the youngest president ever elected (Teddy Roosevelt was younger when he became president, but he took office by accession, not election).
What were the issues that voters were concerned about in that election? I’d like you to take some time and research one of the following elections: 1960, 1964, 1968, and 1972. Briefly introduce the two nominees but focus on the issues that were most important to voters during that time period. Some places to start your research might be
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/elections.php

or

http://www.historycentral.com/elections/

Good luck and God bless!

72 comments:

  1. I researched the election of 1960. It followed the second term of President Dwight Eisenhower and is, by popular vote, the closest presidential election to have occurred. The election was between Democrat, John F. Kennedy and Republican, Richard Nixon. Kennedy was a young Catholic senator from Massachusetts. Nixon was a former congressman and senator, and had served as vice-president for Eisenhower.

    I don't think that there was really one major issue that defined the election, but there were several smaller ones. Among those, were thoughts about Kennedy being too young and inexperienced for a president, and there was some worry about prejudice against his Catholicism, but neither of these issues really hurt him much. Both parties talked about how they could increase economical growth and make it more accessible to minorities. Kennedy took advantage of the arrest of civil rights leader, Martin Luther King Jr.'s arrest and made calls to his family and to local authorities to try to get him released. This gave Kennedy many black votes. One of the biggest events of the election were several debates between the two candidates, most notably there first one. The debate was televised, and a big factor in the event, was the appearance of the two men. Nixon had just been released from a hospital after recovering from an injury, and looked rather tired and sickly during the debate, also refusing makeup; while Kennedy looked nice and well-rested. It seemed that Kennedy won that one, while Nixon won a couple of the other debates, but those seemed less important.

    Shortly before election day, the polls showed a virtual tie between the two candidates. The whole thing was extremely close and intense right up to the very end. In fact there was only a difference of about 100,000 in the popular vote. The electoral college was still close, too, but not anything like that. John F. Kennedy emerged from the race victorious.

    I used the two sites listed, as well as http://modern-us-history.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_election_of_1960

    ReplyDelete
  2. I chose the Election of 1968. The candidates included Richard Nixon for the Republican Party, Hurbert Humphrey for the Democrats, and George Wallace representing the American Independent party. The main issue was this: apparently, this was a very “chaotic” year, because of our involvement in the Vietnam War. Some battles like the siege of Khe Sahn in January and the ongoing TET offensive occurred shortly before primary elections. Johnson chose not to run for re-election, so after the Democratic convention, Humphrey was the Democrat nominee for President since basically the other two wanted to get out of the Vietnman War. As a little background on the American Independent party, they were more racist and war-hungry than the others. One of the main issues was racial discrimination in this election. The return of Nixon in this election was referred to as “ the new Nixon”, because this time his approach was that of more of a calmer, more relaxed state. He simply stated that he would change things up a bit, considering that “the strongest nation in the world was being tied down in Vietnam for four years” and “the richest nation in the world couldn’t handle it’s economy” and we as Americans have “the greatest tradition of the rule of law plagyed by unprecedented racial violence.” According to the chart I saw of the polls, Nixon won by a landslide.


    My sources were the two websites given including this one : http://library.duke.edu/exhibits/sevenelections/elections/1968/issues.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In my research I found some surprising facts about the election of 1972. The main thing that shocked me was the margin by which Mr. Richard Nixon won the election. One of the reasons for this is that his opponent Mr. George McGovern was viewed as a “radical leftist.” This of course was not what the people wanted because Nixon was the one who had lead them out of the Vietnam War and had established a relationship with the Chinese. The result of the election as you have probably guessed by was that Richard Nixon won. However, he did not just win he completely destroyed his opponent. Nixon received five hundred and twenty Electoral College votes while his opponent only got seventeen Electoral College votes. There was one other individual who got an Electoral College vote in this election but nobody cares about him. His name was John Hospers. He only received one electoral vote. This vote came from the state of Virginia. Regardless of the stupid guy from Virginia Nixon still won the election with a twenty three point two percent margin. This is the fourth largest margin in history. as you can see this was a crushing defeat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My sources were the ones that you gave us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will be dicussing the Election of 1964.

    The two candidates in this election were incumbant Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat) and Senator Barry Goldwater (Republican).

    Lyndon Johnson had a lot going for him in the 1964 election. He took over the Presidency after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He also assumed much of the popularity that Kennedy had for his continuation of the Social Projects (Social Security) that Kennedy instituted during his service as President.

    Barry Goldwater was nominated by the Republican Party for President. Goldwater was part of a relatively new kind of movement, the conservatives. He was in favor of abolishing Social Projects, and was a heavy proponent of using nuclear weapons (if necessary) in the War in Vietnam. He also believed in a small-tax, less powerful government that promoted individual rights and business interests and OPPOSED Social Projects.

    The citizens of America, however, weren't ready for the new "conservative" movement quite yet. They wanted more Social Projects, a big government, one that would solve their problems.

    And that is what they got. In the end, LBJ won a huge (the 6th most lop-sided victory ever) victory over Goldwater. LBJ won over 61% of the popular vote.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Election of 1968

    Candidates:

    Republican: Richard M. Nixon
    Spiro T. Agnew
    Democratic: Hubert H. Humphrey
    Edmund S. Munskie
    Independent: George C. Wallace
    Curtis E. LeMay

    Winner: Richard M. Nixon

    Background:
    The U.S. has been involved in the Vietnam War, and many Americans are against it. They want out of there. The economy is in shambles (what’s new?). The Civil Rights Movement is booming, with their recent Supreme Court victories.

    Nixon’s Platforms, Campaign, and Why He Won:
    From 1928 to 1964 the Democratic Party held the Presidential position in the United States, with only one Republican being elected. It was not until the Election of 1968 that the Republican Party took back the office with President Richard M. Nixon.
    Richard Nixon won by a slim margin in the popular vote, but much easier in the electoral vote. His reason for victory can be summarized and attributed to his platform interests in various groups of people. For example, using his “southern strategy”, Nixon appealed to many deep southerners, and at the same time, his interest in Civil Rights won many votes in the North. He desired to bring the troops out of Vietnam and return to a “peace time”, and his strict policies on inner city violence attracted the anti-war, anti-violence protestors.
    He made “law and order” his central theme, and he reached towards the “forgotten Americans”, those who were lost in the crowd so to speak. He spoke of “peace with healing in its wings” and “good times to come” for the American people.

    Etc.:
    Of course we all know the story of Nixon and the Watergate Scandal, and how he will later leave office.

    ReplyDelete
  8. www.u-s-history.com/pages/h907.html
    faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change-Viet3b.html
    uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1968

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Election of 1972

    Richard Nixon: This president had a great impact on American in different sorts of ways. We all know him for the peace signs and of course, Watergate. He was the Californian US representative and was an elected member of the US senate. After being Vice President under Eisenhower, Nixon lost a presidential election to John F. Kennedy and the Californian governor’s race against Edmund Brown in 1962. Victory came when he won the presidential election of 1972.

    George S. McGovern: He was a US representative and senator. Many have not heard of him because he was the loser of the 1972 presidential race. His opposition of the Vietnam War was widely known. John F. Kennedy designated McGovern to be the worldwide director over the Food for Peace establishment.

    Main Issues: A major and probably one of the most prominent issues facing the country during this election time was the Vietnam War. We can look back in history and see how war has such a great effect on our country so the state of the economy was a major concern. This president would be faced with keeping everything stable and, of course, the next move in the war. Another pressing issue would be the specific roles of the government. This was a time that started to take sides on determining how much power was given to the federal government. The third major issue is very familiar to all of us as it is an issue that we still face today. The liberal verses the conservative. I guess in every election you are going to have a little portion of this, but it seems like it is more prominent in some than others.

    My sources were as follows:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_McGovern
    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/elections.php
    http://www.historycentral.com/elections/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sam, you mentioned in the first part of your essay how Lyndon B Johnson had a lot going for him, and I believe that’s a major factor in our government. Some candidates came at the wrong time… it’s all part of politics. When the mood of Americans are influenced by war or economic hardships, the elections are going to be more effected, not by the candidates and what they believe but by how they are going to either fix or address that major issues at hand. I know this is all part of it, it’s what politics are, but at the same time, it fascinates me to see how … influenced or changed… their views and opinions get just by how they are at the moment. It’s the beauty of the complication of the elections.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Camden, I also wrote on the election of 1972 and was so surprised at the huge win by Nixon. When I was looking for the election I wanted to choose, this is what drew me to write about 1972. Nixon won by 503 electoral votes! Just an interesting fact, there was one man, a libertarian, named John Hospers who received one electoral vote. I thought this was funny.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Camden, I read your post. I thought it was relatively interesting and slightly comical. It seems that Nixon won by an extremely large margin in the electoral college. But , of course, as you stated, his opponent, George S. McGovern was a "radical leftist," and that was, of course, not what the people wanted. And there was the John Hospers dude, but apparently nobody cares about him and his one vote from a stupid guy in Virginia. Nixon pwnd those guys.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I read your essay, Anna. I thought that it was pretty informative. Nixon apparently won by many votes like he would also in the next election. I had never heard of the other two guys in the election, probably because they weren't elected president. It seems that the Vietnam was a big issue in the presidency. I now know the details of the election of 1968.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I did the election of 1964 for several reasons.

    First, I like the number '4'. It's a good number, and is divisible by 2. Any number divisible by 2 is a good number in my book.

    Secondly and more seriously, I didn't know much about Johnson or Goldwater. Actually, I had never even heard of Goldwater before this assignment.

    Upon further review, I saw the reason for this. Johnson got almost 91% of the vote, while Goldwater for 9%. I don't know about you, but that seems like more than a little bit of a landslide to me. This is why Goldwater is barely mentioned in history.

    As for Johnson, Mr. Akers made a comment or two about him doing a good job in class, so naturally I was interested in the man. He did a good job of taking over when JFK was shot, and he did his best to sooth a shocked nation. He isn't remembered totally fondly, but he did do a good job of taking Kennedy's programs and running the government relatively smoothly. I can appreciate that.

    The nation didn't want a republican president after so much success with a democrat, at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Election of 1960

    The Republican's candidates were Richard M. Nixon of California for President and Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts for Vice President.

    The Democrat's candidates were John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts for President and Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas for Vice President.

    The Election of 1960 was an incredibly close election. In popular votes, John F. Kennedy received 49.7%, Richard Nixon received 49.5%, and rest of the votes went to other people. In electoral votes, John F. Kennedy received 303 votes, and Nixon received 219 votes.

    Issues:
    There were many issues that voters thought about during the Election of 1960. The debates were televised which aided the American people in having a good knowledge about the candidates. One issue that the people thought about was that Kennedy was Catholic, and that he might be too young and lacking experience for the presidency. In the long run, Kennedy's religion actually aided him. Another was when Martin Luther King, Jr. was arrested in Atlanta, Georgia, John Kennedy offered him sympathy. That gave him a good amount of black support. Both of the candidates talked about the ways they could better the country’s economy, and make it grow. Towards the end of the election Dwight Eisenhower began to campaign for Nixon, but it didn't do a lot for him because Kennedy had basically won the election.

    In the end, John F. Kennedy won the election of 1960, but a few years later he would be assassinated.

    Source:
    http://www.historycentral.com/elections/

    ReplyDelete
  16. The election of 1960.

    The two candidates were John F. Kennedy for the Democratic party, and Richard Nixon for the Republican party.

    Some issues during this election were that John F. Kennedy was Roman Catholic. This caused some voters to fear that his Prsidential decisions might have been affected by either the Pope, or other religious beliefs. He is now known as our first (and so far only) Catholic President.

    Another issue was the Civil Rights movement. When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested, John F. Kennedy made a few calls to get him released from jail. This was a very good move on Kennedy's part, and won him many votes from the black community.

    The Nixon-Kennedy debates were the first debates to be held on live television. This was bad for Nixon because he had just gotten out of the hospital and looked pale, sick, and tired. The people who had watched the debate believed that Kennedy would win, but those who just listened to it on the radio believed that Nixon would win.

    It was a close race, but in the end Kennedy won the election.

    My sources were:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1960

    http://www.historycentral.com/elections/1960.html

    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1960

    ReplyDelete
  17. Emily,
    In your last paragraph you said that the issue of Liberal vs. Conservative is in every election. And that is so true. I hear more about that subject in politics than others sometimes. It's something we will have to get used to I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Jon,
    I also wrote on the election of 1960. What was interesting to me was how close it had been. If Nixon had simply gotten some good sleep the night before, then maybe he would have done better. And what if Kennedy had refused makeup too? Maybe he would have looked bad too.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I used the sites recommended, PBS.org and Wikipedia…
    The election of 1972
    First I will tell you who the candidates are. The Democrat nominee is George S. McGovern; And the Republican nominee Richard M. Nixon. And we all know that Nixon won the Presidency. As I was looking through the websites I noticed how wide the margin was between McGovern and Nixon. On Wikipedia’s website there was a map of the electoral votes of that year. Nixon covered the board, the only state that McGovern won was Massachusetts (he didn’t even win South Dakota which was his home state). During the Primary’s McGovern was depicted as a “radical leftist” which had a hand in how the voting went since this was “one of the most one-sided elections in American history”.
    What mattered in this presidential election…
    Some of the most important points were the Vietnam War , the role of the federal government, and liberalism vs. conservatism.
    Here are some of the views:
    On the Vietnam War--
    Richard Nixon thought that “Achieving peace with honor in Vietnam was necessary to preserve America’s international standing”
    George McGovern said that he believed war was immoral and that we should call for full withdrawal from Vietnam. (I agree that war is not the best thing, but I don’t think that it is immoral unless you are fighting for selfish reasons with no thought of how it is affecting others.)

    On the role of the federal government –
    Nixon went with an approach called “New Federalism” which is the idea that some government programs are best administered by the state than by the federal government.
    McGovern thought that the government should be in charge of administering every program designed to benefit those in need. (Again I believe this to be a good concept, but it is giving the federal government too much power.)

    On Liberalism vs. Conservatism –
    Nixon called it “the New American Majority.” He stood up for patriotism, morality, and religion in the daily lives of Americans.
    McGovern promoted a “doctrine” that promoted individual liberty and freedom of expression. He believed that should play a greater role in “promoting racial fairness and inclusion of all citizens.” (I think that this is a great idea and was very relevant to that time period (in correspondence to the desegregation that happened in the late 50s early 60s)

    Personally I have no idea who I would have voted for. They both seem to have some really good points, but if I had been able to see the future I would not have voted for Nixon because of the Watergate scandal. But overall I think that this was an election with two capable men and it would have been a more fair competition if the Republican
    Party hadn’t “slung mud” at George McGovern.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jake Anderson, I liked how you went about choosing your election(lol). Anyways I am just like you on the subject of Goldwater. I have never heard of him at all. I guess the main reason is because he lost so badly to Johnson, and he was never really mentioned in history a whole lot . On the other hand Johnson is one of the most famous Presidents because he took over the country when John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Like you said he wasn't liked too much, but he did take care of the nation when it was mentally at its weakest point. Overall good essay, Jake.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Camden, Richard Nixon is sometimes thought of as one of the worst Presidents in history because of Watergate. In reality, he wasn't that bad of a President because he did lead us out of the Vietnam War. Overall you had a good essay, Camden.

    ReplyDelete
  22. my sources:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_McGovern
    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/elections.php

    i chase the election of 1972. which was between republican richard nixon and democrat George S. McGovern. Nixon won obviously, cause no one has ever heard of president mcgovern because he was never president.

    what were the issues: we all know president nixon for watergate and because of it many people see him as the worst presidents of all time and there is some credit to the fact that he wasnt perfect, but who is. there are many other things people at the time loved about him, the people wanted change and got it with nixon, he brought us out of vietnam for goodness sake, and those awesome peace signs haha. however, he was somewhat of a crazy in that he thought all the democrats where out to get him. good thing he isnt a republican president today cause pelosi and reed are after all the republicans and conservaties. but anyway, now after my rant. one of the main issues, if not the issue, was vietnam, the president was faced with how to handle vietnam and what steps he would take in reparing the wartime economy and preparing for the slupt that would follow, because in all actuallity it was a war time economy unlike any other because there had not been a really slump after korea because there simply wasnt time. the vietnam war started nearly as soon as the korean war ended.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I will be reporting on the election on 1960. The two candidates were John. F. Kennedy from Massachusetts for the Democrats, and Richard Nixon from California for the Republicans. This election was one of the closest in US history, won by Kennedy by an incredibly small margin. A big issue in this election was the Cold War. Kennedy said that the United States had fallen behind the Soviet Union in the Cold War, and that he would get us back ahead. Nixon said that Kennedy was too young and inexperienced to handle the presidency and the Cold War. Another issue was Kennedy’s religion. Kennedy was a strong Roman Catholic, and many disliked him for that. However, Kennedy promised to keep church and state separated and his religion not greatly affect how he ran the country. In spite of this, it is estimated his religion cost him 1.5 million votes. Nixon stayed away from religious issues. Kennedy also addressed the issue of the space race. He said on multiple counts how we would further our space program and beat Russia. And we know of course about Kennedy’s “We choose to go to the moon” speech he made in 1962. Nixon was not so avid about the space race issue. What seemed to be a turning point in the election was the televised presidential debates in which Kennedy’s youth and charisma won the viewers of the speech. Nonetheless, the election turned out very close. Although Kennedy clearly won the electoral vote, we won the popular vote by around 100,000 votes.

    ReplyDelete
  24. in the election of 1964, we had a few candidates as usual. on the republican bill was Goldwater. on the democratic bill was (current to the time) president Johnson. some of the issues discussed during this time were nuclear weapons, cuts in social programs, what to do with the Tennessee valley authority and even the amount of involvement in Vietnam.

    what was meant by nuclear weapons… well instead of fighting Vietnam, the question of using nuclear warfare against em was suggested. but then you still have to invade and clean up and do all that messy stuff.. so what about cuts in social programs? well Goldwater was majorly against socialistic ways. he wanted as little as possible to do with socialism. one thing I thought negative of Goldwater was he didn’t support civil rights legislation. personally I don’t think that’s the best thing to do when ur running for office. who remembers the TVA? the Tennesse Valley Authority, anyhow, Goldwater wanted it sold. however Johnson was very reserved on wanting to go to Vietnam. he was wanting to limit the amount of time and effort put into it. However, despite this fact, Johnson won a landslide

    ReplyDelete
  25. jake anderson... wow. u never cease to amaze me. first the picture of the picture... now choosing 4 because its divisible by 2 and any number divisible by 2 is good? wow. ha anyhow i thought ur essay was pretty good. i liked how u talked about never hearing of Goldwater and i thought it was rather comical because neither have i!! and the landslide comment.. more like a blowout or a shutdown. i enjoyed reading ur essay.. actually made me laugh.. good job jake

    ReplyDelete
  26. maxwell, on ur comment to camden. i think your somewhat right, that because he was caught with the watergate scandal that he is awful. well he is the only president to resign, and a scandal too. so i can see why ppl would say that he was just plain awful. i think he started up pretty good but as time passed he was slowly getting worse

    ReplyDelete
  27. The 1964 presidential election found America in the throws of two candidates that were of two completely different camps.
    Barry Goldwater was a five term United States Senator from Arizona that was known as "Mr. Conservative." He campaigned against the federal government, labor unions, and the welfare state. He was very involved with the libertarian movement which eventually conflicted with the Christian Right.
    Lyndon B. Johnson was a U.S. Representative that had been J.F. Kennedy's Vice President. When J.F. Kennedy died Lyndon B. Johnson became president of the United States.
    The election of 1964 was the first election that was fought over true issues in thirty two years. Lyndon Johnson was responsible for designing a social platform for the Democratic Party to win on.
    Barry Goldwater was anti government where Lyndon Johnson was involved in laws that upheld civil rights, Public Broadcasting, Medicare, Medicaid, environmental protection and aid to education.
    The Democrats claimed that Goldwater's policies were dangerous and that he would lead the U.S. into war. I feel because of Barry Goldwater extreme stand on certain issues it scarred the American public. Lyndon B. Johnson won by a landslide. Goldwater was much less active as a National leader of conservatives after 1964.
    source: Wikipedia.com

    ReplyDelete
  28. The election of 1960 was held between Democratic Senator from Massachusetts John F. Kennedy and Republican and Vice-President under Eisenhower, Richard Nixon. Kennedy campaigned for getting the country up and running again and blamed Eisenhower for allowing Communism to come to power in Cuba. Kennedy was also Catholic and it was easily a discussion point for Nixon during the election, however he decided to keep his religion out of the debates and instead criticize Kennedy for his lack of experience. Nixon was for the stopping of Communism. He also lead to the charges of spy Alger Hiss.

    One of the biggest things about the election of 1960 was the fact that is was the first election to be broadcast over live television. Kennedy has a very nice appeal to voters as he was young and energetic and this gave him a slight boost from those who saw him on the TV. Also, Kennedy was clam, collected, and well-spoken in front of the cameras while Nixon was nervous and sweated profusely. He had also had a knee injury while campaigning, putting him in pain during the debates.

    In the end, Kennedy pulled through with a 303-219 margin, although Nixon had won more states. While in office, Kennedy was extremely popular. One of the biggest issues of Kennedy while in office was space. Russia had already put the first satellite into space, Sputnik I. The US then formed NASA so compete with the Russian space program. It took time, but 4 years later Alan Shepherd became the first American in space. Sadly, Kennedy's dreams for more good things for America was cut short on November 22, 1963 when he was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas, Texas.

    ReplyDelete
  29. WARNING: This is a pessimistic essay.
    The year is 1960; the candidates: John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The American population has spent countless hours researching both politicians’ stands on important issues. Who am I kidding!? What they really did was just vote their party. The most dramatic election in the United States history was ready to unfold.
    I’ve been asked to discuss what was important to the American people, but the way I see it, what was important was the political party you were raised to vote for. The things that will follow in my writings were not “important.” Rather, they were the downfalls that the opposite party used to bash each candidate… or, in one case, things that helped the candidate.
    Kennedy received a lot of criticism during in his campaign because of the prejudice against his Roman Catholic religion. Some Protestants believed that if Kennedy were to win the election, he would take orders from the papacy rather than the American population.
    Kennedy did find support when civil-rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested in Georgia during a civil rights march. Nixon refused to become involved in the incident, but Kennedy called to local political authorities and got King released from jail. Subsequently, John Kennedy received a lot of votes from the black community.
    The closeness of the election was just flat out scary. After all was said and done, Kennedy had indeed made his way out with a narrow victory over his opponent, winning 303 electoral votes over Nixon’s 219. This seems like a fairly large margin of victory until you look at the popular vote, in which Kennedy won by a mere 100,000 votes, out of more than 68,000,000 cast by the American population. It was the closest popular vote America had ever seen… still to this day.



    www.historycentral.com/elections/1960...
    electionstudies.org/studypages/1960prepost/1960prepost.htm

    ReplyDelete
  30. The election of 1968 had 3 candidates, and since history is written by the victors, I will mainly be focusing on the issues that Richard Nixon addressed during his campaign as well as the man himself.
    After Nixon completed his undergraduate at Whittier College, he graduated from Duke University School of Law in 1937 and returned to California to practice law in La Habra. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, he joined the Navy, serving in the Pacific and got the rank of Lieutenant Commander during World War II. He was elected in 46 as a Republican to the House of Representatives representing California's 12th Congressional district, and in 1950 to the Senate. He was selected to be the running mate of Eisenhower, the Republican Party nominee, in the 1952 Presidential election, becoming one of the youngest Vice Presidents in history. He waged an unsuccessful presidential campaign in 1960, narrowly losing to John F. Kennedy, and an unsuccessful campaign for Governor of California in 1962; following these losses, Nixon announced his withdrawal from political life. In 1968, he ran again for president of the United States and was elected.
    Richard Nixon was the republican candidate in 1968, and faced several important issues, including civil rights and MLK’s assassination, as well as the assassination of Robert Kennedy, another candidate in 1968, and the Vietnam War. Nixon also promised “law and order” against many riots, which was an appealing thing to many voters, if not all. He also said he would do other things, like ending the draft, as well as changing the currently unpopular chief justice of the Supreme Court.


    sources;
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1968#Campaign_themes

    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/elections.php

    ReplyDelete
  31. Michelle: loved your essay. You did a very nice job with your essay. You managed to make a concise summary which I stink it up at; so I admire that. You covered the Catholicism and civil rights, which I put in mine also—I did the election of 1960 just as you had—however, I hadn’t mentioned the debates, and actually didn’t know that Nixon was sick when he did them and that that may have caused him to lose some votes. Quite surprising and interesting .

    Emily: You did a very nice essay, as always. I liked it how you spent on paragraph opn each of the candidates. As has been the case a lot, I’ve never heard of George McGovern. We really never do hear of the loser; some of the times even if we were alive during the election, which is sad. You mentioned the Vietnam War being a big issue and the liberal versus conservative thing. Which will always be a problem. Good job

    ReplyDelete
  32. Election of 1960

    This election was between Vice President Richard M. Nixon, a Republican, and young Senator John F. Kennedy, a Democrat. It is amazing how close this election was. When I read what Mr. Akers said comparing it to a UK football crowd, I was blown away. Anyway, I’ll talk about the election now.

    Kennedy didn’t surprise anyone when he won the Democratic nomination. He was expected to be the Democratic candidate for the Presidency before the outcome of the Democratic convention was reached. In his victory speech, Mr. Kennedy called the ominous new decade a frontier of hope, opportunity, and peril. Kennedy was a young, devout Catholic whose smooth, lively personality was very likeable at the time. He campaigned on the theme of getting America moving again, and he attacked the key issues effectively. For example, Kennedy emphasized outrunning Russia missile-wise, and he criticized the previous administration for letting a Communist regime take power in Cuba.

    Richard Nixon was the Vice President during Eisenhower’s last term. He was kind of the face of conservatism at that time, even though America as a whole was much more conservative at that time than it is now. Come to think of it, even JFK was kind of conservative. He would probably be more like McCain than Obama, nowadays, unlike his relative, the late Ted Kennedy. Despite Nixon’s efforts to not make Kennedy’s religion a prodigious issue, it remained a factor in the election, actually helping Kennedy more than not. The main argument used against Kennedy was his lack of experience.

    Like Mr. Akers mentioned, this election included the first televised debates, giving JFK an edge. Also, Kennedy received massive Black support for offering his sympathy to MLK when he was arrested in Atlanta. I truly hate to even raise this question, but I can’t help it. Did JFK call MLK because of true sympathy, or did he just use that as a tool to gain support from African Americans? Don’t get me wrong; I’d say that is probably not the case, but stuff like that can sometimes happen in politics. I’m just asking that because, based on what I have heard, JFK wasn’t the most active President in the Civil Rights Movement. Once again, I don’t really believe that.

    Of course, as we all know, Kennedy would go on to win and be a pretty good President until he was assassinated.

    ReplyDelete
  33. The election of 1960,was between a senator from massachusetts John F Kennedy (Democrat)and former vice presedent to Ike Eisenhower Richard Nixon (Republican).
    This election would be the first election that hawaii and alaska would be participating in,just recently aquiering statehood.This elections debates were also broadcasted on national television where millions of americans tuned in for what was going on.Some of the points of each of there debates was that nixon brought up the lack of John F kennedys expieriance,and JFK brought up that while Eiesenhower was in office that communism made a huge impact wich really hurt nixons chances.And led to the accusations and arrest of alger hiss.
    In the end kennedy won the election although not winnig the majority of the states.JFK was a very popular and loved presedent. while kennedy was in office NASA (national areonomics,space admn.)was developed to compete with russias space program after they lounched the sputnick 1.and just a few years after the developmen of NASA america put its first man into space.Kennedys presedency came to a sad end on november 22,1963 when he was assasinated in Dallas TX,while riding through the city.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Camden,
    I really liked your essay. I too, find it interesting that America did not want a radical leftist for a president. Wonder if they had the right idea? I think you did an excellent job on your essay considering the only resources you (along with the rest of us) had were a page of statistics. Hard to make that into an essay. But you did an excellent job. I also liked how you used the phrase "this was a landslide election" about five hundred times in your post. This really went to drive the point home. It was kind of a slogan for you it seems. Also, yak yak yak. Over all you did a good job, keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Jarred,
    I do not believe that I have ever commented one of your posts before, so I figured I would give it a shot.

    I somewhat enjoyed your pessimistic point of view, but I do think you took it to the point to where it almost seems like you were blowing things out of proportion, and the essay took on a 'moan-y' perspective. However, the information you had was dead on and seemed very informative. The essay was intriguing with nothing but the bare facts and statistics. I would have read it for the previously stated reasons even if you hadn't posted the warning label and took on a conspiracy theorist persona.

    But in all seriousness, GREAT essay. I really did like it lol.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Michelle, I liked what you said about the Nixon and Kennedy debate. Television was a new way to influence voters and it was an area of pioneering that had not been tried.
    Nixon being sick had done the manly thing by not crying off sick. But instead of playing up his infection he just didn't say anything thus looking scarred and nervous on T.V. instead of his sweating was caused by breaking a fever. He was not that much older than J.F. Kennedy.
    I find it interesting that the people that heard him by radio thought he would win. It was a new era in politics. In this race it went to the one that looked good on T.V.

    Emily, I liked how you chose Nixon vs. McGovern. The country had been running under the Democrat party line for six years.
    McGovern was a strong opponent for America to
    get out of Vietnam. He had a very liberal out look on values. He made some high handed statements that did not win the favor of conservatives.
    Richard Nixon is remembered for Watergate but he left a better track record than that. He helped to open up China. I didn't realize that he was one of the Youngest Vice Presidents in history.(I got that info from Wikipedia)I think his foreign diplomacy was a lot better that L.B. Johnson.

    ReplyDelete
  37. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Most definitely there is the issue of peace. The US had to maintain peace with the Soviet Union without surrendering so we don’t blow up the world. Was developing nuclear bombs a good idea, probably not. Einstein stated that the world was not ready for nuclear capabilities. Another Issue was how to beat the communist. Communism was vastly growing and we should do something to stop the spread of communism and promote our democracy. Another popular issue was growing the military. Of course they should have grown their military. Our enemies were growing their armies so the US had to grow its military too. One of the more important issues was should the US get involved in Asia. In order to stop communism, the U<S was going to have to get involved oversees. There was always the threat of nuclear war and how to prepare for nuclear war. No one is entirely sure that Nuclear winter would occur in such a war, but it is a possibility. So people started building fallout shelters. In latter elections, there was the notion of the space race. We were competing with the soviets in a race to see who could get to the moon and who had the best technology to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Tonight I will be discussing with you about the 1964 election. The democratic nominee Lyndon B Johnson, wear as the Republican was Senator Barry Goldwater. Lyndon B Johnson was the man who took over the reins of Presidency after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. During Kennedy’s presidency he gained much popularity for the many social activities that he instituted. When Lyndon B Johnson took over his role of presidency, the popularity fell on LBJ because he continued those same social activities. But Senator Barry Goldwater was the exact opposite. He opposed those activities. And he was a new kind of candidate for presidency; he was very conservative and believed in smaller taxes and a smaller government. But the people of America were not quite ready for that sort of thing so in result of that Lyndon B. Johnson won back the presidency. At the end of the election Lyndon B. Johnson won 61% of the popular vote and in result he had the 6th most lop sided victory ever over Senator Barry Goldwater.

    I used Wikipedia and the resources you shared with us.

    ReplyDelete
  40. The main candidates of the 1968 election were Richard Nixon from California (Republican) and Hubert Humphrey from Minnesota (Democrat).
    The Issues:
    -In 1968, our troops were still in Vietnam. And although the politicians were saying that we were making progress, South Vietnam was invaded on January 31, 1968. This attack, now known as the Tet Offensive (Tet=Vietnam New Year), reminded Americans that we were still in a war that was growing more unpopular each day.
    -The fight for Civil Rights was at its peak. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated on April 4 at a strike help by black sanitation workers. After the country heard of his murder, rebellious riots sprung up all over the country.
    -Only two months later, on June 5, Robert Kennedy was shot after winning the California Democratic Primary. As a result, anti-war protestors rioted at the Democratic National Convention, causing a lot of tensions with police (who eventually pounded a protestor on live TV)
    America was facing a war against Vietnam and against prejudice in our country and sadly two distinguished men were lost in the battle. In the end, Nixon barely won the election of 1968.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The election of 1972 was held between Richard Nixon, the Republican, and George McGovern (fitting name?), the democrat. There were a few issues that stuck out above the others of the day and those were the foreign affairs (Vietnam War), desegregation and the economy. McGovern was focused on ending the Vietnam War. He wanted to get the troops back home. He also wanted to provide a minimum wage. Though, his ideas are not radical he was portrayed as a radical man to the public by the Republican Party. They were able to do this because his original running mate had chosen to undergo electro-shock therapy, which is still somewhat controversial, and because he had alienated many other Democrats during the primaries. Nixon’s platforms seem very similar; he wanted to focus on the economy and work on our foreign affairs by ending Vietnam and getting closer to China. One thing Nixon did believe differently on was desegregation. He “agreed” with desegregation but not by extreme methods like bussing as McGovern did. This, sort of, on-the-fence stance gave him the voted from northerners and southerners. When you add in the fact that McGovern’s image was damaged it seems obvious that Nixon would win, and he did. He won by the fourth largest margin in a presidential race ever, sixty-one to thirty-eight percent.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1972

    ReplyDelete
  42. The year was 1960 and an interesting and passionate election was about to take place between the youngest pairing of Presidential opponents in American history. The Republican candidate was Richard Nixon, age 47, and the Democratic candidate was John F. Kennedy, age 43. As for the candidates themselves, Nixon criticized Kennedy for a lack of experience while Kennedy ran on a theme of “getting the country moving again.” To be honest, I must throw in that this sounds like a ridiculously familiar pairing of opinions, but anyway… The issues at hand in this time period were new and vast. As for Kennedy’s platform, he made major points on exploring the option of going to space and developing technology. Nixon stuck with Republican ideology on industry and making government smaller. They shared many similar goals, as most politicians do, and the election relied very much on appearance and presentation. The election was constantly tied, back and forth, for much of the season, but things took a turn in a series of four debates between the candidates. Young and handsome Kennedy presented himself eloquently while his opponent, Nixon, while not much older, appeared haggard and unkempt as he refused to wear stage makeup of any kind and being unshaven. This would prove to be a dramatic election, with the amazing revolution of television politics and a new young generation to look forward to the future.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The election of 1968
    The nominees were, Richard Nixon for the Republican party, Hubert Humphrey for the Democratic Party, and George Wallace for the American Independent party. One of the issues was the Voting Rights Act, which required the federal government to guarantee African-Americans and other minority groups the right to vote. Because of this and many other things this was a rough year.
    One of the main things was the siege of Khe Sahn in January and continued with the TET offensive in February. Also the Vietnam War, the issue on which many were divided. But the most remembered will forever be the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. on April 4.
    Obviously Nixon had the advantage with this one. His return was known as “The New Nixon” because his approach was so different from his last. This time he was more relaxed and calmer than before. He wanted to end the war because he hated that a nation like the US was being tied down for four years.
    With the war and everything many people were comparing the election with the 2008 election.
    “A public man must never forget that he loses his usefulness when he as an individual, rather than his policy, becomes the issue.”
    Richard M. Nixon

    http://faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change.Viet3b.html
    http://library.duke.edu/exhibits/sevenelections/electionss/1968/issues.html

    ReplyDelete
  44. Emily, nice job on your essay. It was very informative but I guess the main thing that stood out to me was what you mentioned about the Vietnam war, and how war really affects our country. I’ve never been one to be particularly fascinated with war, but over the course of this year I have especially learned that what you said is true. Picking up the mess after a war is not an easy thing to do, and sadly there are some permanent damages such as the econmy being in shambles, and people losing their lives.




    Blake, while reading your essay I was in awe of how close the election of 1960 really was. Wow. Also, it was very interesting to read about the differences between Kennedy and Nixon, and the opinion of the people who thought Kennedy was too young and lacking of experience and because of his religion. The fact that Kennedy’s religion actually aided him in the long run reminds me of 1 Timothy 4:12 that says “don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young but rather set an example for the believers in speech, in life, in love, in faith and purity.”

    ReplyDelete
  45. Michael, you had a really good essay. I don’t know much about the 1964 election, but it seems to me that it was an election that caused the American people to think. As far as I know both Candidates were well qualified, but in response to the last paragraph where you stated that you thought Goldwater was a little too extreme on certain things and that scared the American public. I think I know where you got that, you said “Barry Goldwater was anti government.” I think that in this case it would be something that would scare anyone because when we have a leader that is anti-government we approach Anarchy (such as the days when we were under the Article of Confederation.)

    ReplyDelete
  46. Guffey, you had a good essay. It seems to me that during 1968 there were a lot of controversial things going on. For example; the Vietnam War, a war that today still causes great controversy. Also there was a fight for Civil Rights, there had been a lot of turmoil since the end of the Civil War, and even though the blacks were equal in the sight of the Constitution the people didn’t treat them as equals. Both of these “wars” as you put it were in some ways something that human kind should never have, though we all come from different cultures we are the made by the same God and we should all see that we are equal.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Robbie, your essay was very good and informative, as usual. I’ve always kind of thought that point in our history is pretty interesting, so I did the same election. I think it is cool that you mentioned the “We choose to go to the moon” speech. It seems like one of the big factors in Nixon not winning is his lack of Kennedy’s passion about the space race issue.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Your essay was also pretty cool, Jon. Once again, you did yours before anyone else. I always procrastinate and wait till Friday. You did a nice job describing the issues, not issue (like you said), of the election. I would somewhat feel sorry for Nixon, looking and feeling rough like he was during the debating. Of course, he would go on to become President in another election anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Emily, thank you for commenting on my essay. I really like to hear what other people think about what I research. I also like how you mentioned the fact that in almost every election there is a battle between a liberal and a conservative. These things are what make elections so interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Roberto, one thing that I noticed in reading your essay was that the election was a close one. The country obviously loved both candidates. I thought that it was interesting that Nixon then went on to win an election by an amazing margin. Just think what would have happened if Kennedy had been running against someone who was a nobody? The outcome probably would have set records for margin of votes.

    ReplyDelete
  51. My last comment is to Mr. Akers. I would just like to ask you if you could please start doing some assignments that are more oppinionated. I really enjoy being able to find out what others think about the issues. I would also like to bring up what you said at the start of the year about posting comments in dissagreement. It is really hard to dissagree with facts.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Josh, you brought up an interesting point about JFK in the election. We won't really know whether he offered his sympathy for votes or if he really meant it. Like you said though, I think JFK was a pretty honest man from hearing his speeches and the way everyone liked him and I don't think he did it solely for votes. I am sure that thought crossed his mind, but I think he really did have sympathy for him. Also, the African-Americans voters, from what I can tell, weren't disappointed with him in office.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Camden, I see that Nixon won by quite a bit. 4th most “bit” in history to be exact. It's good to see that Americans had the since to not vote for someone with such obscured views. Although Nixon didn't necessarily have bad views, he didn't do the right things in office either which lead to the Watergate scandal. Good Job Nixon.....

    ReplyDelete
  54. Josh, as to your question “Did JFK call MLK because of real sympathy or to gain support from the African-Americans.” I think know that it could be debated both ways. I personally like to think that JFK helped to get the African Americans started voting. Even if he did do it just to get votes, it still let people know that they couldn’t shove the blacks around any more. Now I don’t mean to sound rude (you’ll just have to deal with it) but if anyone doesn’t like someone ells because of their skin color that person needs a major eye exam of something.

    Caleb, I really liked your essay. JFK did some amazing things before and after his election. But I think the greatest was the fact that he was elected. Many people didn’t want him as president because they thought that (because he was so young) he didn’t have enough experience.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Michelle, it was really interesting to hear about that Kennedy was Roman Catholic, and I could see how voters would think that his views could be affected by other important figures such as the Pope. I was also happy to hear that Kennedy was able to get Martin Luther King released; he used his power very wisely.
    I found it fascinating that the opinions of who would win the election differed so greatly between the voters who watched it and the voters who listened to the radio. It makes sense, though, that the voters would want a healthy president, and seeing Nixon like that probably changed their image of him.
    Good essay. =]
    Jarred, sadly you are right. People do tend to vote with their parties even when they don’t entirely agree with their party’s candidate. Of course there are exceptions-those people that do what’s right and vote on the issues and not on pure politics, but unfortunately, for the most of the voting population this is not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  56. The 1968 election was a republican victory for Richard Nixon. He ran against Hubert Humphrey the democratic nominee and George Wallace the nominee for the American Independent. Nixon campaigned with a policy of "Law And Order" and talked of the United state's struggle with the assassination of a U.S. president and the fact that a country of our size and power should fear no one. He supported an improvement of the US economy. The winner of the election was Nixon and the usually solely democratic south voted mostly republican for the first time in a very long time.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Jarred your essay was excellent. I enjoyed your coverage of JFK's springing of the civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. while I hate to say it was only for the votes of the black community it is the way it seemed. I'd love the idea that someone would do something for no reason like that.

    ReplyDelete
  58. David your highlighting of the fact that it seemed the republicans and the democrats were uniting on the Vietnam War and desegregation. It seemed the country was close together but so very divided at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I chose the election of 1960. The candidates were John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was a Republican from California. He had been Eisenhower's Vice president. Kennedy was a Democrat from Massachusetts. Kennedy had said the under Eisenhower and the Republicans that the nation had fallen and that if he was President that he would " get America moving again." Nixon said that if he was elected he would continue "peace and prosperity" which Eisenhower had started in the 1950's. He also said that Nixon was to young and inexperienced to be President. Nixon had said that he would campaign in all 50 states, but a knee injury set him back. He was unable to campaign for 2 weeks. When he got out of the hospital, he still wanted to keep his pledge and go to all 50 states even though he knew he would not get many votes from some of them. He wasted precious time doing this. While Nixon was doing that, Kennedy was compaigning in large states like New jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio getting their votes.

    There were four debates, they were the first to be on television. Viewers believed that Kennedy won that debate whil radio listeners believed that Nixon had won. After Nixon had recovered, it was believed that he won the 2nd and 3rd andd that the 4th debate was a draw between the two.

    Some people believed that since Kennedy was Catholic he would have to take orders from the Pope if he was elected President. But he told the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on September 12, 1960, "I am not the Cxatholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic party's candidate for President who also happens to be Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters - and the church does not speak for me." It was believed that he lost some states because of his Catholicism. But in the end, Kenndy came out on top and won the election of 1960

    ReplyDelete
  60. Jarred had a nice introduction. People will hardly ever do research on the candidates and understand their principles and their background. Instead they vote the un-American way and vote for the person on their party just because they are of their party. What I mean by un-American is that people have worked hard and died for our rights, one being the right to vote, and people just take it for granted and vote carelessly just because their want their party to win. Elections have become just a contest like a football game where two teams try to win it all.

    ReplyDelete
  61. The presidential election that I chose was the election of 1960. This election was between John F. Kennedy, the Democratic nominee, and Richard Nixon, the Republican candidate. The third party runner in this election was a man by the name of Harry F. Byrd, but his input in the election did not make much of a difference. This election was one of the closest if, if not the closest election, of all time. The margin of victory in the popular vote was 118, 574 votes, which may sound like a lot to some people, but it is only an astounding 0.2 percent of the vote!!

    One of the issues in this election was not so much an issue, but more so a point of view Nixon thought would help him win. Kennedy was very, very young, so Nixon thought that if he could point that out to the American people, they would pick Nixon due to his age and supposed more wisdom than Kennedy due to his youth. Another issue, that actually involved the citizens of America, was the economy. Both parties really pushed towards economic growth and giving more and more access to the minorities of our country. Most elections involve that issue, but this one really emphasized it. But the most amazing thing about this election was no issue, but the tightness of the race, beginning to end.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Very interesting Biggen. I have a theory. Political parties seem to conflict on just about every issue. Being in Mr. Akers class I noticed that every time a political party takes a large amount of power for a long time they find a way to mess it all up allowing the other party to get a foothold. Whenever there is a balance between two parties, the system seems to work the way it should. Perhaps it is this struggle that is the reason that the United States has survived for so long on one constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  63. J Byrd,
    I really enjoyed reading your essay, not only because I chose the same election but because you gave good details. Not so much a lot of details, but good quality details. Like John F. Kennedy being a Catholic or a senator from Massachusetts. I didn’t even think to put that in mine. But I like your description of the tightness of the race which is what actually interest me about it in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anna Katherine,
    Your essay was also a very good read. I was going through looking for an essay that involved an election revolving around the Vietnam War since that is what we are now studying in class. I did not know that all these things occurred before even the PRIMARY ELECTIOS. That really is a chaotic year if you ask me. I also like your description of how racial discrimination played a major role in the election because racial discrimination needed to be completely stopped.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Camden & Mr. Akers.
    This is in response to Camden's last comment towards Mr. Akers. Well I totally agree with Camden on that, but it is good that we have essays that are about the facts so we can learn to have true opinions on those matters. But I would really like to see more of an oppinion based questions, it would rouse up more conversation and we kids won’t come on hear just to do the homework but want to see what others are talking about. So Thank you Mr. Akers and I would love it if you took into consideration of what Camden and I were talking about. May God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Goofey Goober,
    Your essay was very good. You had some very good points in there and the way that you wrote the essay was smooth and well written. You Could really tell that you had passion behind the essay for what you were talking about. It was not just another homework assignment to you. Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Robbie,
    Very interesting report on the election of 1960, between Kennedy and Nixon. Although I reported on the same election, you seemed to have much more information. Kudos on the effort, good sir. I was intrigued to learn what a small margin Kennedy won by in the popular election. It’s also interesting to see the distinct difference in popular vote and electoral vote. Makes a person think a little about this democratic system of ours. Anyway, very good report and I enjoyed reading it.

    David,
    Very good reporting, with both fact and commentary. Just what any article needs. It’s interesting indeed to see how much damage or help an “image” will affect a politician, or any man for that matter. If the media and public opinion can be convinced of one thing, it’s hard to get them to give that person another glance. This is why so many politicians end up later being involved in scandals, because we all have issues and people who seem like they don’t are just hiding them. Hah. At any rate, good analysis of why the election turned out the way it did. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  68. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  69. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Vanessa, we both chose different elections, but they were similar in some ways. First a person’s image played a HUGE role in the election. Like McGovern in the election of 1972, when Nixon lost appeal to the American public his position in the polls lowered. Even currently smear campaigns are run by opposing parties to make their opponent less likable. American’s are extremely superficial, like most cultures, and this influences the way we vote. Also, both candidates had similar goals but different ways to get to the solution. The elections were different though, in the election of 1972 McGovern’s appeal was so damaged the Nixon won by a huge margin unlike Kennedy who had an extremely close race against Nixon.
    Josh, when you wrote your essay on the election of 1960 you convey just how likable Kennedy was. You pointed out Kennedy’s inexperience, just like Vanessa did, as a sticking point his opponents used, and how his religious affiliation helped him more than hurt him, like his opponents thought it would. As for the question you raise about his motives behind his call to Martin Luther King Jr. only he, and anyone he told, can be sure of his intent. Personally, I believe it was probably a mixture of two things: he really did sympathize with him and he knew it would look good politically.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Jarred,
    I thoroughly enjoyed your comments about how people tend to vote for their political party without first examining the candidates policies, platforms, and personal chracteristics. I believe it is essential to first look at those things before you even think about party. Today, labeling yourself as being from a certain party almost means nothing, or at least nothing positive. I could say I'm a Republican and people automatically assosciate me with Bush, and therefore hate me. Oh well..
    I liked your essay, even with the pessimistic twist.


    Michelle,
    I read your essay, and found the bottom paragaphs to be very interesting. I guess I never thought about the way people-especiall those with political power or office-appear on television. I personally have always noted their gestures, words, tone of voice etc. But you brought out a great point about Nixon being pale and sickly looking. That, in my mind, would make him have appeared to be weak and not fit for the job, so to speak.
    Good job on your essay Michelle!

    ReplyDelete
  72. The Election of 1972

    This president (Richard Nixon) was a very influential man. He created at least one nationally recognized symbol of peace. We all know, of course, Watergate. He represented Calif, as a republican of course.. He even found himself a seat on the US senate, then to move to vice president.

    George S. McGovern: He was a US representative and senator. He was a pacifist and was proud of it. He openely opposed the Vietnam war. America did not want another pacifist. Loser.

    As far as main issues go, technology played a HUGE role in this election. With the televison being now open to the public they were able to host the debates on air. And, of course, the war was heaviest on most peoples minds.

    ReplyDelete