In American history classrooms not too long ago one might have been convinced
that all the important contributions to human history were made by wealthy white
men. In the documentary we watched (partially) earlier this year by Dr Jarred
Diamond entitled "Guns, Germs, and Steel" we learned why white Europeans, who as
recently as five or six centuries ago were woefully primitive in comparison to
their middle-eastern and Asian contemporaries, would become the dominant culture
through the age of imperialism and colonization. And, because of western social
structure (much of which comes from the Bible) and physiology (men tend to be
physically stronger than women), men have usually occupied the positions of
leadership in society.
The modern study of history emphasizes the
contributions of all parts of society. Indeed, rather than "great individuals"
moving history, the opposite was often the case - doors of opportunity were
opened to those in leadership because of the collective actions and decisions of
ordinary people - regardless of race or gender. In an effort to remind us that
history is about everybody, not just the powerful and wealthy few, historians
now celebrate the history of previously underreported segments of society by
dedicating a month to their story. Just as February was Black History Month,
March is Women's History Month. Because of the way the school schedule worked out I wasn't able to get a Womens' History assignment in last month, but...better late than never, right?
Your assignment this week is to visit
the link
Womens' History Month which is hosted by the US Library of
Congress and follow the link entitled "Exhibits & Collections". There you
will choose an article to read and report back to the class. Share what you
learn and comment on what knowledge we would lose if we focused solely on the
"great men" of history while neglecting everyone else.
Remember to meet
all the requirements for this assignment and to post your essay on time for full
credit. Have a good week!